In this week’s Time magazine, Christine Lagarde (Managing Director, International Monetary Fund) addresses the question at the top of October’s Annual IMF and World Bank meeting. How can we secure the global economic recovery? Ms Lagarde purports that IMF has lent more than $300 billion to ‘countries facing testing times’ including countries in Europe, Latin America and the Middle East – in addition ‘increasing support for the poorest nations, especially sub-Saharan Africa’ where the interest rate from related loans is now 0%.
In the same magazine, Bill Gates (Founder and Chairman of Microsoft and Co-Chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) talks of the importance of measuring what is given against what is achieved. Mr Gates uses the example of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) as an area where 8 clear targeted measurements led to agreements regarding aid distribution and targeted funding distribution.
Whilst aiding and measuring are key external influences – they are just that, external to the problem. Despite the phenomenal amount of aid and funding given to struggling countries, many core problems of corruption, crime and civil wars arguably remain the root dichotomy of why an areas such as the African continent – seem unable to create ongoing stability. It is hard to watch the events taking place in many of the African countries and cities – Kenya, Congo, Sudan, Uganda, Somalia – unfolding when so much goodwill, hard cash and practical aid has been forwarded, over many many years.
When I studied my degree on International Development, I was asked by an African at an event in London, what it covered. I briefly gave a description and she immediately said ‘for goodness sake do not think of coming to Africa in the future and giving us advice’. She went on to tell me that for years she had worked in Government and been subject to Consultants input from many agencies, and she was fed up with people telling them what to do. At the time I laughed, for it was the furthest thought from my mind. However whenever I hear about aid and funding to the poorest countries now, if I had an opportunity contribute, I would focus on an element which seems to be missing – leadership – honest, trustworthy, hardworking, practically focused, with a vision of unity and underpinned with personal sacrifice not personal wealth accumulation. It is not that this doesn’t happen – Nelson Mandela, to me, was such a leader or Mahatma Gandhi who’s strong non-violent approach led a civil movement.
At its best it seems to me that leadership is really quite humble. The best of leaders, is aware of the least of those they are representing. Positive transforming leadership takes time – perhaps within the internationally accepted democratic four year terms we have created, it is much harder to maintain momentum for transformational change. In addition it is harder for countries who aspire to leverage themselves out from debt and aid, to partner with world leaders where political leverage is key. Helping to mentor nations out of deeply ingrained challenges takes decades, not sequential electorial terms.
Some of the best international minds have been working on these challenges for decades, and I am not suggesting there are any quick answers (they would have been found I am sure).
When a project is failing in business, or needs to keep being restarted, you have to examine the root causes and address these, otherwise whilst the project will continue to absorb funding, it will not deliver its purpose. Also in Time magazine, Bunker Roy (Founder & Director of Barefoot College) talks of his view that the root of all development failures can be related to the ‘top-down business model’ where poor communities are not consulted, engaged or treated as equal. The Barefoot College has been working in Africa with women, many of whom are illiterate and yet enabling and producing solar electricity for their communities, at a highly competitive price, whilst reducing pollution. There is something very positive in this model and for many other organizations such as Oxfam, World Vision, Tearfund and others working ‘on the ground’ there would be, I am sure, consensus of agreement to the importance of engaging the local community.
Last year INJAZ al-Maghrib committed to training 26,155 Moroccan students in entrepreneurship over three years, coordinating with 70 corporations. The CGI partnership, Banking on Change, supports the pooling of community savings and helps support self-governing group – mobilizing and empowering people locally.
When we hear about failings in countries which make up continents such as Africa, whilst painful, these events that the media brings to our attention are only part of the story – perhaps the reality is that in a myriad of ways, across a variety of stakeholders, we are further towards solutions than we realize. As the darkest moment is just before the dawn – perhaps a new day really is approaching.